For no particular reason I asked one of those AI things the following:
"𝘏𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘨𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘦?"
I deliberately kept my prompt question quite vague and non-UK specific with a view to getting a more useful answer. Anyway, imagine my surprise when a part of the answer included 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝘣𝘰𝘯 𝘮𝘰𝘵𝘴:
Actually, I think it "misspoke" 𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻 and in its first reply had garbled The Greenbrier Ghost case from 1897 West Virginia - as opposed to 1930s England. The idiot!
If nothing else, I can now see why Ian Terminator was moved to write his eponymous screenplay.
For no particular reason I asked one of those AI things the following:
"𝘏𝘢𝘴 𝘢 𝘨𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘧𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘪𝘯 𝘢 𝘤𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘦?"
I deliberately kept my prompt question quite vague and non-UK specific with a view to getting a more useful answer. Anyway, imagine my surprise when a part of the answer included 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗲 𝘣𝘰𝘯 𝘮𝘰𝘵𝘴:
"[...] 𝘈𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘦𝘹𝘢𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘦 1930𝘴 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘯 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦 "𝘨𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘢 𝘮𝘶𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘮𝘢𝘯" 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘢𝘴 𝘴𝘢𝘪𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴, 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘮𝘶𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯."
Naturally, I pursued this as follows:
"𝘗𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘭 𝘮𝘦 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘯𝘦."
To which the AI tease definitively proved its Red Berry Solero-ness with the response:
"𝘐 𝘢𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘻𝘦 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘶𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘣𝘶𝘵 𝘪𝘵 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘐 𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘱𝘰𝘬𝘦 𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘦 1930𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘌𝘯𝘨𝘭𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘨𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘢 𝘮𝘶𝘳𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘷𝘪𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯. 𝘞𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘩𝘢𝘷𝘦 𝘣𝘦𝘦𝘯 𝘷𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘤𝘥𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘪𝘮𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘨𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘹𝘵𝘴, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘯𝘰 𝘸𝘦𝘭𝘭-𝘥𝘰𝘤𝘶𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘦𝘥 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘦 𝘧𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘦𝘳𝘢 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘧𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘦𝘴𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘱𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯. 𝘔𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘧𝘦𝘳𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘰 𝘨𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘴 𝘪𝘯 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘭 𝘤𝘢𝘴𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘦𝘯𝘥 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘦𝘤𝘥𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘧𝘰𝘭𝘬𝘭𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘳𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘯 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘮𝘢𝘭 𝘭𝘦𝘨𝘢𝘭 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘤𝘦𝘦𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨𝘴. 𝘊𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘺𝘱𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘳𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦 𝘦𝘷𝘪𝘥𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘴 𝘵𝘦𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘮𝘰𝘯𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘣𝘦 𝘴𝘶𝘣𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘦𝘥, 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘪𝘮𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘷𝘰𝘭𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘴𝘶𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘭 𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘨𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢𝘥𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘣𝘭𝘦".
Actually, I think it "misspoke" 𝗮𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻 and in its first reply had garbled The Greenbrier Ghost case from 1897 West Virginia - as opposed to 1930s England. The idiot!
If nothing else, I can now see why Ian Terminator was moved to write his eponymous screenplay.
Sadly it’s no longer Twitter, Rich.
It’s Musk’s X.
Or MusX.
I am not calling it anything but Twitter